ALKOS.INFO

11 comments

1. » rafalr:
   

   nie wiem czemu, lecz tutaj najbardziej pasuje mi to ;)
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2fDUb57_xk

   (Thu 17/12/09, 1:49 am)

    

2. » Ivan:
   

   all your recent B&Ws look like delta 1. Meaning you’re pushing the heck out of your films. asa 3200 @ 12800? ;-)

   (Thu 17/12/09, 5:54 am)

    

3. » alkos:
   

   believe or not, they are 400@1600… its just my lack of darkroom skills probably – it was waaay easier to scan pushed ones :-P On the other hand, they are merely proofs… I’d spend considerably more time on a final print, dodging&burning.

   (Thu 17/12/09, 8:31 am)

    

4. » noncyh:
   

   he ty chyba 90% dnia spędzasz na ulicy:) – gdzie ty to znajdujesz??:) – dobrze jest:)

   (Thu 17/12/09, 9:10 am)

    

5. » bawgaj:
   

   coś mi sie czcionka na biało wyświetla i mało widzę ?
   fajna fota

   (Thu 17/12/09, 10:10 am)

    

6. » beanow:
   

   fajne, magiczne takie…:)

   (Thu 17/12/09, 10:11 am)

    

7. » alkos:
   

   juz poprawione :-)

   (Thu 17/12/09, 10:36 am)

    

8. » Ivan:
   

   What grad do you use?
   I as well have next to 0 experience in the dark room, but a good deal there of in developing film. When I push “old” emulsions like APX, TriX, HP5 to 1600, they usually tend to look just like a “native” 1600 film (neopan 1600 for ex.), and the prints tend to be far less contrasty than yours.

   But I use grad 2.

   (Fri 18/12/09, 5:17 am)

    

9. » alkos:
   

   I use 3,5 to 5, depending on the scene.. maybe I’m underdeveloping…

   (Fri 18/12/09, 7:59 am)

    

10. » Ivan:
    

    try using 2 and thoroughly developing the paper(!).
    This makes the shadows deep, but does not mess with contrast, nor the midtones.

    I dont think you’re underdeveloping – shadows seem to have enough detail.

    (Sat 19/12/09, 8:22 am)

     

11. » alkos:
    

    I am developing paper to completion… on the other hand, I like this look :-P It presents much better on the print itself :-)

    (Sat 19/12/09, 10:41 am)